Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03635
Original file (BC 2013 03635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03635

			COUNSEL:  NONE 

			HEARING DESIRED: NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry (RE) code “2C,” (Approved Honorable Involuntary 
Separation or Entry Level Separation), on his DD Form 214, 
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed 
to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force.  



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Having his reentry code changed is his last option to fulfill 
his duty and his dream to serve his country.  He has exhausted 
all other options.  

The applicant did not submit any additional documentation in 
support of his request.  

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 
8 November 2011.  

On 9 February 2012, his commander notified him that he was 
recommending him for discharge under the provisions of Air Force 
Policy Directive (AFPD) 36-32, Military Retirements and 
Separations and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208 
Administrative Separation of Airmen, paragraph 5.26.3, for 
failure to progress in military training required to be 
qualified for service with the Air Force or for performance of 
primary duty.  Specifically, the applicant twice failed the 
Physical Aptitude Strength Test (PAST) of his Tactical Air 
Control Party (TACP) preparatory course and was eliminated from 
the course.  

On 9 February 2012, the applicant acknowledged receipt of 
the commander’s intent to discharge him and his rights to 
consult counsel, submit statements in his own behalf, or waive 
either of the rights.  On 14 February 2012, he opted to consult 
counsel and submit a statement in his behalf.  

Subsequent to the file being found legally sufficient, the 
discharge authority approved the recommendation and directed 
that the applicant be discharged with an honorable character of 
service.  The applicant was released from active duty on 
23 February 2012 with an uncharacterized character of service 
and was credited with completing 3 months, and 16 days of active 
duty service.  



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  DPSOA states the applicant does 
not provide proof of an error or injustice in reference to his 
RE Code.  The RE Code “2C” is the correct code based on the 
applicant’s involuntary discharge with uncharacterized character 
of service.  

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 31 October 2013, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  To date, a response has not been received. 



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.  

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.


The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 1 April 2014, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
      			, Member
			, Member


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-03635 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149 dated 27 July 2013.  
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.  
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 13 September 2013.  
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 October 2013.  








Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01229

    Original file (BC 2013 01229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of a Letter of Evaluation; his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; Request and Authorization for Separation; and three character references. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05462

    Original file (BC-2012-05462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05462 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Re-entry (RE) code “4C” “Approved Involuntary Separation for Concealment /Physical Standards/Less than 9.0 RGL,” be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. AFPC/DPSOY will provide applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with RE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05130

    Original file (BC-2011-05130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any evidence that an error or injustice occurred in the processing of his discharge warranting a change to his type of discharge or character of service. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 23 March 2012 for review and comment within 30 days. BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 04510

    Original file (BC 2012 04510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to allow his reentry into the military. On 25 July 2012, the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05611

    Original file (BC 2013 05611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 Nov 13, after serving four months and seven days, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service, and issued an RE Code of 2C and Narrative Reason for Separation of “Entry Level Performance or Conduct.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04212

    Original file (BC-2011-04212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records the discharge to include the RE code and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. DPSOS found no evidence of an error or injustice in the processing of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00923

    Original file (BC-2012-00923.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00923 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a RE code 1 series that would allow him to reenlist. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01755

    Original file (BC-2012-01755.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01755 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to allow reentry in the military. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03801

    Original file (BC-2012-03801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03801 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C – Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service,” be changed to allow him to reenter the military. On 29 October 2012, the applicant was notified of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04520

    Original file (BC-2011-04520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04520 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Re-entry (RE) code “4C” “Approved Involuntary Separation for Concealment /Physical Standards/Less than 9.0 RGL,” be changed in order for him to reenlist in the Armed Forces. DPSOS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel...